⛏️创客淘金
无代码/独立开发者社区B2B赞助+付费会员落地可行性

1人运营无代码社区,十年试错后月入$10K,累计6次出售微创业项目

Solo founder builds no-code communities, hits $10K/mo after 10 years of trial, completes 6 successful acquisitions

No Code Founders、Tiny Empires · 无代码社区 · 6年以上 · $10k MRR

收入规模
$10K–$25K / 月
团队规模
1人独立开发者
启动速度
6年以上
复刻难度
★★★☆☆
访谈亮点
  • 十年零收入试错积累,最终跑通搭建-出售微创业的可复制模式
  • 🎯全链路无代码技术栈,零自研成本搭建3.4万人大社区
  • 🚀UGC内容+SEO形成增长飞轮,大部分新用户来自自然搜索
  • 💡以出售为目标的创业思路,完全反转传统创始人决策逻辑

创始人10年零收入摸索,靠无代码工具搭建轻资产社区,累计6次出售微创业项目,模式轻资产低门槛,适合轻资产做社区的创业者参考。

No Code Founders、Tiny Empires

连续失败的创业者

A serial failed founder

我是个连续失败的创业者,在发现Bubble无代码工具之十年零收入前,我有整整十年线上收入为零,才迎来了第一次突破。我的第一个Bubble应用是一个远程工作招聘板,专门展示匹配用户所在时区的远程岗位,几个月后就被We Work Remotely收购了。从那之后我又卖掉了另外5个无代码创业项目,我的商业模式就是搭建并出售微型创业项目。过去6年我一直在运营nocodefounders.com,最近还做了Tiny Empires订阅通讯,这两个月均1万美金项目最近也被收购了,我留任继续运营社区和内容。被收购之前,两个项目月均收入约1万美金,月收入波动在0到2.5万美金之间,总共有约3.4万名会员。

I'm a serial failed founder. I had ten years of making $0 online before getting my first break when I discovered Bubble. My first Bubble app was a remote job board that specialized in showing you jobs that were hiring in your own timezone. It got acquired by We Work Remotely a few months later. Since then, I've sold five other no-code businesses. It seems my business model is building and selling micro-businesses. For the past 6 years, I've been running nocodefounders.com and, more recently, the Tiny Empires Substack. These were both recently acquired too, but I've stayed on to continue running the community and content. Before I sold them, they were averaging around $10k/mo, but it varied month to month — anywhere from $0 to $25k. We've got about 34,000 members.

📅

关键里程碑

2019年之前 · 10年试错,线上收入始终为0

2019年 · 创办No Code Founders Slack社群

2020年 · 上线赞助和付费会员体系完成商业化

2021年 · 搭建Bubble站点启动SEO增长飞轮

2025年之前 · 累计出售6个微创业项目,总会员3.4万

无代码产品的演化路径

The evolution of a no-code product

我在2019年无代码冷启动路径运动刚兴起的时候,把「无代码创业者」最初做成了一个免费的Slack社群。作为一个不会写代码的人,我之前一直磕磕绊绊做产品,发现Bubble之后我第一次有机会成为正经创业者,我意识到有很多和我处境相似的人,所以建了Slack社群把大家连接起来。社群花了几个月才凑够100个成员,整整一年之后我才把它做成商业化项目。随着Slack社群增长,我开了一份通讯,整理社群里的热门讨论每周发给大家,引导大家回到社群参与对话。这些自然的讨论吸引了很多无代码工具厂商的注意,我就做了几个赞助方案发给这些平台的CEO,他们都很感兴趣,我就上线了赞助项目,等给会员积累了足够多价值之后又推出了付费会员体系。

I initially started the No Code Founders as a free Slack group back in 2019, when the no-code movement started to take off. As a non-coder, I had been fumbling my way around building products. But discovering Bubble allowed me to become a serious founder for the first time ever. I realized there were many other people in similar situations, and I set up the Slack group as a way to connect with them. It took a few months to reach the first 100 members, and it took a full year before I turned it into a business. As the Slack group grew, I started a newsletter to share updates on what was being posted in the Slack. Each week, I would curate these and send them out so that everyone would jump back into conversations. These natural conversations brought a lot of attention from the no-code tools themselves. So, I created some sample sponsorship packages and sent them to the platforms' CEOs to see if they were interested... and they were! I launched a sponsorship program, then a paid membership once I had built up enough value for members.

🚀

冷启动策略

从免费社群起步,先积累100个种子用户,跑通社群价值之后再做商业化,避免一开始就付费导致用户增长停滞

极简技术栈

A simple stack

最初我的技术栈只有Slack,之后用Carrd做落地页,再升级成Webflow做的简单博客站,最后变成现在用Bubble搭建的目录/ marketplace站点。现在我的技术栈就是无代码技术栈Bubble、Stripe、Beehiiv。如果让我从头再来,我会把更多精力放在社区运营而不是技术上,现在有很多现成的社区运营工具,比如用Circle这类工具的话,我就能省出更多时间和会员互动、产出价值。

The stack was initially just Slack. Then, I built a landing page on Carrd. That graduated into a simple blog site built on Webflow. And then, finally, it became the current site — a directory/marketplace built on Bubble. So, these days, my stack is: Bubble, Stripe, Beehiiv. If I had to start over, I would focus more heavily on community and less on tech. There are a lot of off-the-shelf solutions for running community businesses now. Using something like Circle would have allowed me to spend more time delivering value by engaging with members and creating initiatives.

⚙️

技术与运营思路

完全不需要自研代码,所有环节用现成无代码工具拼接,技术维护成本几乎为0,把核心精力放在社群运营和内容产出上

社区运营的挑战

Community challenges

社区生意的难点在于,不同增长阶段的社区运营痛点社区成员需求完全不一样。100人规模的社区和1万人规模的社区,用户想要的东西天差地别,这导致我的商业模式变动比预想的多,每隔几个月就要调整策略。整体来看赞助一直是收入的大头,我们还提供一次性付费的终身会员,变动最多的就是赞助权益和会员权益的内容。

The challenge with a community business is that the desires of the community change at each stage of growth. What a community of 100 members wants is very different from what a community of 10,000 members wants. For me, that meant the business model moved around a bit more than I expected. I've had to change strategies every few months. Overall, though, sponsorships have historically accounted for the bulk of the revenue. We also offer a lifetime membership, which is a one-off fee. The things that change most are what's included in the sponsorships and memberships.

👥

产品定位提醒

社区没有一劳永逸的运营方案,不同规模阶段要及时调整权益内容,才能持续满足用户需求,保持社群活跃度

靠内容和SEO增长

Growth via content and SEO

最开始我靠发布其他创业者的访谈增长,我在当时还叫Twitter的平台上找有意思的创业者,邀请他们做文字访谈,之后把访谈内容分享到社交媒体和通讯里,吸引更多用户,我反复做这件事直到Bubble站点搭建完成。Bubble站点允许用户自己提交内容,包括他们的创业项目和使用的工具,我把优质内容通过UGC+SEO飞轮通讯分享,形成了用户贡献内容的飞轮。之后我学习了SEO知识,优化站点对用户生成内容的收录,大部分新注册用户都来自谷歌搜索,现在大语言模型也会基于搜索结果把我们推荐为优质创业者社区。

Initially, I grew by publishing interviews with other founders. I would look for interesting stories on Twitter, as it was called at the time, and invite them to a written interview. I would then share these on social media and via the newsletter, and they would attract a few more users. I did this repeatedly until the Bubble site was built. The Bubble site allowed users to submit their own content, including details about their startups and what tools they used to build them. Again, I shared the best content via the newsletter, and this created a flywheel of more content being added. Over time, I learned more about SEO and built the site in a way that would optimize each new piece of user-generated content that was added. This led to most of the sign-ups coming through Google. Fast-forward to today, where the LLMs now recommend us as a founder community based on the search engine results.

📈

增长渠道组合

完全不需要付费投放,靠内容积累实现复利增长,后期AI大模型也会基于搜索结果推荐站点,进一步放大自然流量

五条创业建议

Five pieces of advice

1. 严肃对待创业最佳实践,不要过度乐观2. 一边读创业相关书籍一边动手做产品3. 复用已被验证的商业模式,不要自己发明新的4. 核心创业心法瞄准B端客户而不是C端消费者5. 定价比你预想的更高一点

1. Take startup best practices seriously, rather than being overly optimistic
2. Read startup books and start building simultaneously
3. Use existing business models, don't invent your own
4. Target businesses rather than consumers
5. Price higher than you think

💡

核心创业方法论

不要盲目追求创新,复用成熟商业模式、瞄准B端付费客户、合理提高定价,能大幅提升创业成功率,少走90%的弯路

未来规划

What's next?

接下来我的目标是打造线上产品,帮大家省出更多线下生活的时间。你可以在X和领英上关注我,也可以免费加入nocodefounders.com和tinyempires.substack.com。

From here, my goal is to build online products that give people more time to spend offline. You can follow along on X and LinkedIn. And you can join both nocodefounders.com and tinyempires.substack.com for free.

Who is it for?

  • 熟练使用无代码工具的创业者
  • 擅长内容运营的独立开发者
  • 有长期试错耐心的个体创业者

Not for

  • 追求快速变现的短期投机者
  • 完全不懂内容运营的纯技术开发者
  • 目标做长期上市级产品的创业者

用户评论与创作者回复

已过滤 spam、低价值附和与重复内容 · 原始 87 条 · 展示 9 条 · 创作者回复 1

9
网友 1
👍 2
坦诚分享

'Ten years of making $0 online.' Thank you for sharing this honest metric. As a founder who recently burned $160k trying to reinvent the wheel in fashion-tech before finally finding traction, this is the validation I needed today. We often only see the 'overnight success' stories, but the decade of invisible grinding is the reality for most of us.

'十年线上零收入',感谢你分享这个真实的数字。我之前做时尚科技项目烧了16万美元试图完全创新,最后才找到方向,这个故事给了我很大的共鸣。我们平时看到的都是一夜成名的故事,但大部分创业者都要经历十年无人知晓的打磨期。

笔记:点出了大部分成功故事刻意隐瞒的长期试错阶段,给正在熬低谷期的创业者很强的信心支撑

网友 2
👍 2
追问SEO

I'm more interested in how you did the SEO, this is the most difficult part I guess

我更想知道你是怎么做SEO的,我猜这应该是整个项目最难的部分

笔记:精准点出普通创业者最关心的增长难点,UGC内容优化SEO是可复用性极强的经验

网友 3
👍 1
单干探讨

The solo founder path is underrated. No co-founder disagreements, no equity splits, full ownership of decisions. The tradeoff is obvious but so is the upside. What's your biggest bottleneck right now — product or distribution?

单人创业的价值被严重低估了,没有合伙人矛盾,不用分股权,所有决策自己说了算,虽然有明显短板但收益上限也很高。你现在最大的瓶颈是产品还是分销?

笔记:探讨独立开发者模式的优劣势,给想走单人创业路径的人提供了新的思考角度

网友 4
👍 1
深度洞察

The timezone-based remote job board is the kind of product insight that looks obvious in retrospect but wasn't: the remote job market had dozens of job boards, but none of them surfaced 'is this job actually hiring in your timezone?' as a primary filter. A meaningful filter on an existing market is almost always faster to validate than a new market.

基于时区筛选的远程招聘板这个点子事后看起来很简单,但当时没人做:远程招聘赛道有几十家平台,没有一家把「岗位是否匹配你的时区」作为核心筛选条件。在成熟市场做一个精准的实用过滤器,比开辟全新市场的验证速度快得多。

笔记:提炼出了微创业最实用的方法论:在成熟赛道找细分功能空白,成功率远高于做全新品类

网友 5
👍 1
追问拐点

Powerful advice on targeting B2B and pricing higher ten years of $0 online is a long time, but it clearly built the grit needed for the 'micro-business' model. Looking back, do you think discovering Bubble was the turning point, or was it the shift in your networking approach?

瞄准B端、提高定价的建议非常实用,十年零收入的经历确实打磨出了做微创业需要的韧性。回头看你觉得发现Bubble是转折点,还是你的社交方式转变才是转折点?

笔记:引导创业者思考自己的核心拐点,而不是把成功完全归因于工具

网友 6
👍 1
踩坑共鸣

This really resonates, especially the part about focusing more on community than tech. A lot of founders (myself included) tend to overbuild before there's real pull. Starting with Slack + a newsletter and letting monetization emerge feels like a lesson many people skip. Also appreciate the honesty about income fluctuating $0 to $25k/mo is a reality most case studies don't show.

我太有共鸣了,尤其是「把精力放在社群而不是技术上」这点。很多创业者包括我自己,都喜欢在没有真实用户需求的时候就过度开发产品。从Slack+通讯起步,等需求出来再做商业化,是很多人都跳过的重要步骤。大部分案例都不会告诉你月收入在0到2.5万美金之间波动的真实情况,这份坦诚非常难得。

笔记:点出了90%创业者都会犯的过度开发错误,轻资产起步的思路非常有参考价值

网友 7
👍 1
定价疑问

pricing higher than you think is very interesting advice. It seems counter-intuitive somehow, but hey - if that works, that's amazing!

「定价比你预想的高一点」这个建议很有意思,看起来反直觉,但如果真的可行效果会非常好。

笔记:点出了 indie founder 普遍存在的定价过低问题,提高定价是提升利润最简单的方式

网友 8
👍 1
UGC追问

I’m curious about the UGC (User Generated Content) flywheel you mentioned: In the early days, what was the main incentive for users to submit their startup details to your site? Was the promise of exposure in your newsletter enough, or did you have to manually seed the content for a long time before it became organic?

我很好奇你提到的UGC飞轮:早期用户愿意主动提交自己的创业项目信息的核心激励是什么?靠通讯里的曝光机会就足够了吗,还是你需要手动填充内容很久才能形成自然增长?

笔记:问到了UGC增长最核心的激励机制问题,对做内容社区的创业者非常有参考意义

网友 9
👍 1
模式启发

'My business model is building and selling micro-businesses.' This is a massive mindset shift. Instead of trying to build one massive unicorn for a decade, you cracked the code on building repeatable, sellable assets. We often over-engineer the MVP. Seeing you start with just Slack and evolve into a Bubble/Stripe/Beehiiv stack is the perfect validation for keeping it lean.

「我的商业模式就是搭建和出售微创业项目」这个思路是巨大的认知升级,不用花十年赌一个独角兽,你跑通了搭建可出售资产的可复制模式。我们经常把MVP过度复杂化,你从Slack起步慢慢迭代出完整技术栈的路径,完美验证了保持轻量的重要性。

笔记:提炼出了全新的微创业思路,完全打破了传统创业者必须追求长期做大的固化思维

J
JT · 创作者
回复 网友 9
创作者回复

Thanks for your support Hafizur

感谢你的认可

笔记:创始人正面回应了这个思路的价值

Localization Notes

  • 国内可用知识星球替代Slack搭建私域社群,微信公众号+小鹅通承接内容和付费会员体系,工具链完全成熟
  • 对接国内SaaS厂商、无代码工具品牌获取商业赞助,是比C端付费更稳定的收入来源,客单价高且用户付费意愿强
  • 针对细分垂直人群做UGC内容目录站,优化百度搜索收录,可快速获得精准自然流量,获客成本几乎为0
  • 走「搭建-验证-出售」的微创业路径,不用追求长期上市目标,小而美项目也能多次变现,风险极低
  • 冷启动阶段不要花精力自研复杂系统,用现成工具快速跑通社群价值验证,避免无效投入浪费时间