一年内将GEO工具增长至中五位数MRR
Growing a GEO tool to a mid-five-figure MRR within a year
LLM Pulse · AI搜索品牌监测SaaS · 2个月上线 · 月入$10K-$50K
- ⚡2个月快速推出MVP,不追完美,先验证核心付费假设
- 🎯全新GEO赛道从零建立测量标准,不到一年达成中五位数MRR
- 🚀多渠道组合增长:个人品牌+Demo+SEO,90%转化来自自然 inbound
- 💡反常识选专用服务器替代云服务,从上线第一天就实现成本完全可预测
Daniel Peris联合2位资深创始人,发现AI搜索品牌曝光监测需求,2025年5月启动开发,7月上线MVP,不到一年达成中五位数MRR,核心靠个人品牌、Demo驱动、极简团队控成本实现快速增长。

从1995年开始的独立黑客之路
Indie hacking since 1995
我一直是个网络极客和建造者。
I’ve always been a bit of an internet nerd and a builder.
我的背景是商业和增长,但职业生涯起步很早。我1995年第一次上网,随后不久建了自己的第一个网站。没多久我就已经在为客户设计和开发网站了。
My background is in business and growth, but I started my career very early. I first got online in 1995 and built my first website shortly after. Not long after that, I was already designing and developing websites for clients.
多年来,我构建、扩展并出售了网站、移动应用和Chrome扩展程序。
Over the years, I’ve built, scaled, and sold websites, mobile apps, and Chrome extensions.
2007年,我将自己的一个项目变成了真正的生意。2013年,我创建了全球首批ASO(应用商店优化)机构之一,现在拥有15名员工。2017年,我推出了一款ASO SaaS产品。它没有达到最初的预期,但我在2021年将其出售了。
In 2007, I turned one of my own projects into a real business. In 2013, I started one of the first ASO (App Store Optimization) agencies globally, which now employs a team of 15 people. In 2017, I launched an ASO SaaS product. It didn’t become what I originally expected, but I ended up selling it in 2021.
然后,在2025年5月,我看到品牌在AI生成的答案中里程碑出现(或未出现),很明显这将变得重要。我想向自己证明我能构建一个SaaS并将其变成一个真正大型的业务。于是我决定快速行动。我找到了两个我真正想一起构建的人,我们启动了LLM Pulse。
Then, in May 2025, I saw brands appear (or not) in AI-generated answers, and it was clear this would matter. And I wanted to prove to myself that I could build a SaaS and turn it into a truly large business. So, I decided to move fast. I found two people I really wanted to build with, and we started LLM Pulse.
我于2025年7月与两位联合创始人——Adrián Rojas 和 Esteve Castells 共同发布。我们帮助品牌监测和改善他们在ChatGPT、Gemini、Perplexity等AI驱动搜索平台中的曝光表现。
I launched in July 2025 with two cofounders — Adrián Rojas and Esteve Castells. We help brands monitor and improve how they show up in AI-driven search platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity.
完全自举。我们的团队只团队有三位联合创始人,这迫使我们对驱动价值的事情保持极度专注。我们只做对增长或产品价值有直接影响的事情。没有为了路线图而存在的路线图。
It is fully bootstrapped. Our team is just three cofounders, which forces us to stay extremely focused on what drives value. We only work on things that have a direct impact on growth or product value. No roadmap for the sake of it.
目前,我们处于中五位数MR收入R,并且逐月稳定增长,增速随时间加快。
Currently, we're at a mid-five-figure MRR, and it's growing steadily month over month, with growth accelerating over time.
里程碑时间线
2025年5月 · 发现AI搜索品牌曝光监测需求,组建3人联合创始人团队,启动LLM Pulse开发
2025年7月 · MVP正式上线,核心功能为可靠监测品牌在AI生成答案中的曝光表现,用户开始付费
2026年3月前 · 上线不到一年,达到中五位数MRR($10,000–$50,000区间),增速逐月加快
产品定位
两个月内发布
Launching in two months
在之前的SaaS项目中,我花了太多时间和金钱来构建启动第一个版本。我不想在这里重蹈覆辙。所以,我们于2025年5月开始构建LLM Pulse的MVP,并在7月发布。
With a previous SaaS project, I spent too much time and money building the first version. I didn't want to repeat that here. So, we started building the MVP of LLM Pulse in May 2025 and launched it in July.
我们的目标不是构建一个完美的产品,而是快速验证我们能否可靠地测量品牌在AI生成答案中的表现。
Our goal wasn't to build a perfect product, but to quickly validate that we could reliably measure how brands show up in AI-generated answers.
所以我们只专注于核心:构建能运作的东西,给我们可靠的数据,并且人们愿意为之付费。
So we focused only on the core: building something that worked, gave us reliable data, and that people were willing to pay for.
一旦这个核心成立,我们就在其上叠加其他一切。
Once that worked, we layered everything else on top.
至于技术栈,我们保持简单和务实。我们避免了典型的大型云端设置。我们大部分基技术础设施运行在专用服务器上。这给了我们更多控制权,并在扩展时保持成本可预测。
As far as the stack, we kept the stack simple and pragmatic. And we avoided typical big cloud setups. We run most of our infrastructure on dedicated servers instead. It gives us more control and keeps costs predictable as we scale.
启动策略
技术选型
没有现成剧本
No playbook
最大的挑战是在一个没有清晰剧本的心态领域里构建。事情变化很快,你不断在信息不完整的情况下做决策。
The biggest challenge has been building in a space with no clear playbooks. Things change fast, and you’re constantly making decisions with incomplete information.
我们不得不保持创造性,从第一性原理出发做决策,快速测试,并基于有效的结果进行迭代。
We had to be creative and make decisions from first principles, testing things quickly and iterating based on what worked.
我们也非常灵活。我们不会在问题出现之前就试图解决它。我们在问题出现时处理它们。
We’ve also been very reactive. We don’t try to solve problems before they exist. We deal with them when they show up.
对于处于类似处境的人,我的建议是:保持简单,快速行动,并随着学习不断调整。
My advice for those in a similar position: Keep it simple, move fast, and continuously adjust as you learn.
核心心态
三个优势
Three advantages
三件事特别有帮助。
Three things have been especially helpful.
第一,作为小团队保持高度灵活。我们避免不必要的会议,保持沟通简单,这让我们能够快速行动并保持专注。但这也是一个挑战。我们必须有意地定义角色、优先级和沟通方式,以便在只有三个人的情况下保持效率。
First, staying very agile as a small team. We avoid unnecessary meetings and keep communication simple, which allows us to move fast and stay focused. But it's also a challenge. We had to intentionally define roles, priorities, and communication to maintain efficiency with just three people.
第二,做大量演示。演示是我们学习的主要来源之一。直接与用户交谈,看他们如何与产品互动,建立关系,帮助我们更快地改进。
Second, doing a lot of demos. Demos have been one of our main sources of learning. Talking directly to users, seeing how they interact with the product, and building relationships has helped us improve much faster.
第三,经验。我们来自SEO领域,之前构建过产品。我们过去犯过错误,其中一些相当严重,这帮助我们避免重蹈覆辙。
Third, experience. We come from SEO and have built products before. We’ve made mistakes in the past, some of them quite serious, and that helps us avoid repeating them.
这种组合——速度、直接反馈和经验——对我们来说是一个巨大的优势。
That combination, speed, direct feedback, and experience, has been a big advantage for us.
团队模式
增长组合
多种增长策略的组合
A combination of growth strategies
我们没有依赖单一渠道。多种策略协同推动了我们的增长。
We didn’t rely on a single channel. A combination of strategies working together drove our growth.
我们的个人品牌是早期的重要驱增长动力。我们积极分享我们在构建什么以及我们对AI搜索的看法,吸引了合适的受众。
Our personal brands were a big early driver. We actively shared what we were building and our perspective on AI Search, attracting the right audience.
如前所述,我们也做了大量演示。演示不仅对学习至关重要,也对转化用户和建立早期关系至关重要。
As I mentioned, we’ve also done a lot of demos. Demos have been key not only for learning but also for converting users and building early relationships.
此外,我们创建了免费工具作为引流工具,组织了网络研讨会,致力于SEO(我们的背景),并发布研究报告以分享市场见解。
Additionally, we’ve created free tools as lead magnets, organized webinars, worked on SEO (our background), and published studies to share market insights.
时机也有所帮助。AI搜索增长非常快,理解和衡量其发展确实存在真实需求。
Timing has also helped. AI Search is growing very fast, and a real need exists to understand and measure its developments.
当然,一个运作良好且用户真正喜爱的产品也带来了很大的差异。
Of course, a product that works well and users genuinely like has made a big difference too.
我们所做的一切都与增长一致;每一个行动都朝着同一个方向推进。
Everything we do aligns with growth; every action pushes in the same direction.
适合谁做
- ✓有SEO/增长背景的连续创业者
- ✓能快速建立个人品牌的B2B SaaS创始人
- ✓有SaaS产品经验的技术+商业复合型创始人
Not for
- ✗不懂SEO/增长且无个人品牌积累的纯研发者
- ✗只有1人且无联合创始人资源的独立开发者
- ✗期望有现成行业打法参考的保守型创业者
深耕SEO
Doubling down on SEO
鉴于我们的背景,SEO对我们来说是一个自然的渠道,但我们保持了非常专注。
Given our background, SEO was a natural channel for us, but we kept it very focused.
我们从强大的技术基础开始:清晰的架构、适当的索引,以及易于抓取和理解的结构。我们还使用结构化数据使我们的内容对搜索引擎更清晰。
We started with a strong technical foundation: clean architecture, proper indexing, and an easily crawlable and understandable structure. We also use structured data to make our content clearer for search engines.
从那里开始,关键在于相关性。我们基于在市场中看到的SEO真实问题创建内容,而不是基于搜索量,我们专注于在这个领域建立我们的品牌和定位。
From there, it’s about relevance. We create content based on real questions we see in the market, not on volume, and we focus on building our brand and positioning within this space.
内容更少,但更有用。这已经足够让SEO(和AI搜索)为我们发挥作用。
Less content, but more useful. That’s been enough to make SEO (and AI Search) work for us.
SEO策略
失败并犯错
Fail and make mistakes
以下是我的建议:
Here's my advice:
忘掉完美。
Forget about perfection.
快速构建,经常发布,不要浪费时间担忧尚未存在的问题。
Build fast, ship often, and don’t waste time worrying about problems that don’t exist yet.
大多数你害怕的事情不会发生,而那些发生的,你会想出解决办法。
Most things you’re afraid of won’t happen, and the ones that do, you’ll figure them out.
你会失败并犯错。这是游戏的一部分。
You will fail and make mistakes. That’s part of the game.
坚持下去。
Just keep going.
关键证据
接下来是什么?
What's next?
展望未来,计划很简单:构建出色的产品,提供出色的支持,拥有大量满意的客户。
Going forward, the plan is simple: Build a great product, give great support, and have a lot of happy customers.
除此之外,我们希望:
Beyond that, we want to:
- 保持团队精简
Keep the team small
- 快速行动
Move fast
- 在已有效的事情上加倍投入
Double down on what’s already working.
我们的目标是构建一个大型业务。这次这是动力的重要部分。继续前进。继续构建,继续改进,看看我们能走多远。并且享受其中的乐趣。
We’re aiming to build something big. That’s an important part of the motivation this time. And keep going. Keep building, keep improving, and see how far we can take it. And have fun.
本地化提示
- 国内AI搜索生态尚未成熟,GEO类产品当前需求极小
- 若要复刻需完全替换监测对象为百度AI、文心一言、豆包等国内平台
- 数据出境合规风险高,所有采集逻辑必须部署在国内服务器
- 客户教育成本极高,当前阶段不建议贸然投入
用户评论与创作者回复
已过滤 spam、低价值附和与重复内容 · 原始 47 条 · 展示 10 条 · 创作者回复 7 条
Reaching mid-five-figure MRR within a year is a masterclass in distribution. But as a Systems Architect, I’m always looking at the "Fragility Gap"—the point where rapid growth outpaces internal logic. How much of your current growth is tied to manual hacks, and how much is baked into an automated 'Systemic Loop' that scales without you?
一年内做到中五位数MRR是分销的典范,但作为系统架构师我很关注“脆弱性缺口”:快速增长超过内部承载能力的临界点。你们当前的增长有多少依赖手动操作,又有多少已经沉淀为无需人工干预就能扩张的自动化闭环?
笔记:点出高速增长背后的潜在风险,提醒创始人区分临时技巧和可规模化的系统能力。
Great point — but honestly, we haven’t faced that yet, so we’re not over-optimizing for it. We try to stay very grounded in reality. Spending time on hypothetical constraints too early usually leads to unnecessary complexity, and that goes against how we operate. We prefer to move fast, stay close to what’s actually happening, and react when real constraints show up.
说得很好,但说实话我们还没遇到这个问题,所以不会提前过度优化。我们坚持完全立足现实,太早为假设的限制投入时间只会带来不必要的复杂度,这和我们的运营原则相悖。我们更倾向于快速行动,贴近真实业务,等真正的限制出现时再处理。
笔记:再次印证了创始人“不为未发生的问题提前优化”的核心运营哲学。
Mid five-figure MRR in a year is a dream run, especially for a geo-focused tool. I’m curious about the data side of things—did you find it hard to keep your margins healthy as you scaled, or did you find a way to keep data/infrastructure costs lean?
一年内做到中五位数MRR对GEO工具来说是梦幻开局,我很好奇数据层面的问题:随着规模扩大,你们如何保持利润率健康,有没有办法让数据和基础设施成本保持精简?
笔记:直击数据密集型SaaS的核心痛点,关注规模化后的单位经济模型。
Curious—at that stage, are most of your conversions coming from inbound, or are you doing any outbound/pitch-based growth?
好奇问一下,在当前阶段你们的转化主要来自自然流量,还是有做主动外联推销类的增长动作?
笔记:区分 inbound 和 outbound 增长的真实占比,对B2B SaaS冷启动极具参考价值。
Mostly inbound. We do some outbound, but it’s not the core. It’s more for learning and opening doors. Most conversions come from inbound — being visible where demand already exists.
绝大多数是自然 inbound。我们做少量主动外联,但不是核心,更多是为了学习和打开关系。大部分转化都来自自然流量,也就是在需求已经存在的地方保持曝光。
笔记:验证了创始人个人品牌+内容定位带来的精准流量效率远高于盲目的冷 outreach。
A good read. I feel like sometimes I over-plan and procrastinate hoping things fall neatly into place. I'm trying now to "Move quick, make mistakes and adjust as necessary"
读得很有收获,我之前总过度规划、拖延,指望事情自己理顺。现在我也在尝试“快速行动、犯错、按需调整”的模式。
笔记:点出绝大多数创始人都有的“过度规划=变相拖延”的普遍痛点。
Totally get that — happens to all of us. Over-planning feels productive, but most of the time it’s just a safer form of procrastination. What has worked for us is exactly that: move fast, ship, and adjust based on reality. Things rarely fall neatly into place anyway. You’re on the right track.
完全懂这种感受,所有人都会遇到。过度规划看起来很高效,但大多数时候它只是更安全的拖延形式。我们验证有效的方法就是快速行动、发布、基于现实调整,反正事情很少会自己理顺,你选的方向完全正确。
笔记:创始人用亲身经历给被拖延困扰的创业者提供了情绪价值和行动指引。
Really like the “no playbook, just first principles” approach — feels very real for anything AI-related right now. Also refreshing to see less focus on volume (SEO/content) and more on actual relevance and demos.
非常喜欢“没有现成剧本,只从第一性原理出发”的思路,对现在所有AI相关的创业都特别真实。也很高兴看到你们不追求SEO内容的数量,反而更看重实际相关性和演示的价值。
笔记:精准提炼了案例中两个最反常识、最值得借鉴的核心策略。
Appreciate it, really. Right now things are moving too fast for playbooks to hold for long. First principles tend to age much better. And yes, we’ve seen that shift too. Less about volume, more about actually being relevant in the moments that matter.
非常感谢。现在行业变化太快,任何现成打法都撑不了多久,第一性原理反而更经得住时间考验。我们也确实发现了这个趋势:不用追求数量,更重要的是在用户真正有需求的时刻提供相关的价值。
笔记:解释了第一性原理在高速变化的AI赛道的独特价值。
The reactive approach to problems is smart. The instinct to over-plan and over-build before launching kills more products than bad ideas do. Two months to MVP with three people and no playbook is impressive. The demo-driven feedback loop makes sense too - nothing replaces watching someone actually use what you built.
遇到问题再处理的思路非常聪明,上线前过度规划、过度开发的本能杀死的产品比糟糕创意杀死的多得多。3个人在没有现成打法的情况下2个月推出MVP太厉害了,Demo驱动的反馈闭环也非常合理,没有什么能替代亲眼看到用户实际使用你产品的过程。
笔记:把案例中的多个亮点串联起来,总结出小团队创业的通用最优路径。
Really appreciate this, thanks a lot. We’ve just seen that too many times. Overbuilding before real usage usually leads nowhere. Watching people actually use the product changes everything. It forces clarity very fast and removes a lot of assumptions. Still early for us, but this way of working has made a big difference so far.
非常感谢。我们见过太多次这种情况,在真实用户使用之前过度开发最终只会一无所获。亲眼看到用户用产品会改变一切,它能快速帮你理清思路,推翻大量错误假设。我们还在早期,但这套工作方法到目前为止带来了巨大的正向改变。
笔记:再次强调Demo作为反馈渠道的不可替代性。
Mid five-figure MRR in under a year in a brand new category is a serious result. Good read. The dedicated servers thing caught my eye, everyone just defaults to cloud and then acts surprised when the bill arrives. Keeping costs predictable as you scale is one of those boring decisions that quietly saves you.
在全新赛道不到一年做到中五位数MRR是实打实的好成绩。专用服务器的点特别吸引我,所有人都默认上云,等账单出来才大吃一惊。在扩张过程中保持成本可预测是那种看似无聊却能默默救你一命的决策。
笔记:点出绝大多数创业者忽略的“成本可预测性”的隐性价值。
Really appreciate it, Will. And yes, exactly that. Dedicated servers are not the sexy choice, but they give you control and predictability early on. I’ve had some pretty bad cost surprises with cloud in the past, so we wanted to avoid that from day one. So far, it’s been one of those quiet decisions that paid off.
非常感谢。完全是这样,专用服务器不是什么酷炫选择,但它在早期就能给你完全的控制权和可预测性。我之前用云服务吃过好几次成本超支的大亏,所以我们从第一天就想避免这个问题。到目前为止,这是少数几个默默带来巨大回报的决策之一。
笔记:解释了创始人做这个反主流决策的过往经验背景。
The "no playbook" problem is real in AI search monitoring. You're essentially building the measurement standard for a space that didn't exist two years ago. Most early-stage founders treat demos as sales but the signal you get from watching someone interact with your product live is irreplaceable. Curious how you handle the reliability problem. AI search results are notoriously inconsistent across sessions and geographies. How do you give brands confidence that what you're measuring is representative?
AI搜索监测领域“没有现成打法”的问题太真实了,你们本质上是在为一个两年前还不存在的领域建立测量标准。大多数早期创始人把Demo当销售工具,但看用户实时操作得到的信号是无可替代的。好奇你们怎么解决数据可靠性问题:AI搜索结果在不同会话和地区之间差异极大,你们怎么让品牌相信测量结果是有代表性的?
笔记:直击GEO赛道最核心的技术难点,是非常专业的行业深度提问。
What stands out most to me is how deliberately you’ve avoided “scale for scale’s sake” traps: No cloud bloat → dedicated servers for control & predictable costs. No roadmap for the sake of it → only work that directly impacts growth or value. No solving problems before they exist → react, don’t predict. That last one is rare and underrated. Most founders waste months building for hypothetical scale or edge cases.
最让我印象深刻的是你们刻意避开了“为了规模而规模”的陷阱:拒绝云服务冗余→用专用服务器获得控制权和可预测成本,拒绝为了路线图而路线图→只做直接影响增长和价值的事,拒绝提前解决不存在的问题→反应优先而非预测优先。最后一点非常少见,绝大多数创始人都会浪费好几个月为假设的规模和边缘场景开发功能。
笔记:把案例中的多个反常识决策提炼成了可直接复用的避坑清单。
Really strong example of building for a shift in behavior, not just a trend. A lot of people saw “AI search” getting attention. The smart part here was turning that into something measurable and operational for brands. In new markets, the winners usually aren’t just the ones who move first — they’re the ones who help customers make sense of what’s changing.
这是一个非常好的“为行为转变而非短期趋势创业”的案例。很多人都看到了“AI搜索”的热度,但聪明的地方是把它转化成了品牌可测量、可落地的服务。在新市场里,赢家通常不只是行动最快的人,而是那些帮助客户理解变化的人。
笔记:从更高维度总结了这个案例的底层价值,解释了为什么LLM Pulse能在新赛道跑赢。
Localization Notes
- 当前国内主流境外AI搜索平台(ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity)均无法访问,直接复刻LLM Pulse的基础前提不存在
- 若转向国内AI搜索生态(百度AI搜索、文心一言、豆包、Kimi等),当前平台开放数据接口极少,采集技术路径需要完全重建
- 国内企业客户对AI搜索品牌曝光的认知度极低,GEO概念尚未普及,市场教育成本远高于海外
- 数据出境合规要求严格,所有AI平台数据采集和存储逻辑必须完全部署在国内服务器,避免合规风险
- 建议等待1-2年国内AI搜索生态成熟、企业客户需求明确后,再评估该赛道的创业机会