自举投行做到年交易规模超1亿美元
Bootstrapping an investment bank to $100M+ deal volume
Discretion Capital · 并购投行 · 10年以上逐步迭代 · 年交易规模超1亿美元
- ⚡技术博士跨界投行,用自研爬虫替代高价商用数据库,自建数据护城河
- 🎯零前置收费,靠帮创始人把初始报价提升3倍实现口碑裂变
- 🚀避开传统投行红海,聚焦ARR 200-2000万美元的SaaS并购赛道,年交易破亿
- 💡打破技术创始人抵触销售的误区,用“月付500-5000美元”标尺筛选高价值服务方向
计算机博士出身的创始人靠技术差异化切入SaaS并购投行赛道,年交易规模超1亿美元,核心优势是懂技术创始人需求,靠口碑获客,行业门槛极高。

入行契机
Falling into it
2015-2016年我卖掉了第二家入行起点公司,之后开始为传统私募机构提供技术尽调服务。一次和客户吃饭时对方告诉我,他们愿意为交易线索付费,只要我介绍的标的最终被他们收购,我就能拿到分成,我后来才知道这就是买方经纪的业务模式。我做了几次这类撮合,其中一笔最终成功交割。那段时间大型PE机构开始下沉B2B SaaS赛道,2010年之前PE很少收购ARR低于1000万美元的SaaS公司,后来他们的收购门槛降到了100万美元。我认识的很多创始人都开始收到PE的冷邀约,我成了他们咨询建议的首选对象。一开始我只是免费给他们判断邀约质量、机构靠谱程度,直到有一次我告诉一位创始人,对方的报价比他能拿到的合理价格低了1-2倍,而且那家PE机构出了名的裁掉本土员工榨取利润,他问我能不能帮他找到更好的报价,我就顺势开启了现在的业务。
I sold my second business in 2015-16 and then got pulled into doing technical due diligence work for old-school PE firms. One time, I was out to dinner with one of those clients, and someone said, "You know we pay for deal flow." I had no idea what that meant, so he explained, "You know, if you introduce us to someone we end up buying, we'll give you a cut." I now realize this is what buy-side brokers do. So, I did that a couple of times, and one ended up closing. Right around then, the larger PE firms started moving down market in the B2B SaaS space — before 2010 or so it was rare for PE to buy SaaS businesses with less than $10M ARR, but they started buying as low as $1M. So, lots of founders that I knew (directly or indirectly) started getting cold inbound offers from PE to sell their business, and I ended up being the go-to guy for advice. Initially, I'd just give founders my opinion — good offer, crap offer, terrible firm, etc. Then, one time I was chatting with someone and I explained that not only was the offer likely 1-2x lower than what he could get, the PE firm that had made the was notorious for firing all domestic staff and milking profits. He then said, "Okay, thanks. Hey, could you help me find a better offer?" So I thought, "Yeah, I probably could." And here we are.
Who is it for?
- ✓有SaaS行业资源的资深技术从业者
- ✓熟悉并购规则的金融从业者
Not for
- ✗无行业资源积累的新手
- ✗缺乏金融合规资质的创业者
Discretion Capital与TinySeed
Discretion and TinySeed
现在我主要运营两个项目:Discretion Capital是完全自举的投行,TinySeed是面向自举创始人的基金。刚启动Discretion的时候我不想招一堆MBA,也买不起PitchBook这类高价交易数据库自研数据系统,所以我自己写了一套爬虫系统,跟踪全球几乎所有PE机构及其投资组合。现在我们的内部系统已经加入了AI能力,核心逻辑依然是记录谁持有什么资产、什么时候收购的这类核心信息。
These days, I'm mostly working on: Discretion Capital— a bootstrapped investment bank, TinySeed— a fund for mostly bootstrapped founders. When getting started on Discretion, I didn't want to hire a bunch of MBAs, and I couldn't afford PitchBook or other databases of deals and portfolios. So, I built a set of scrapers to keep track of approximately all the PE firms in the world and their portfolios. Our internal systems are quite a bit more sophisticated now, with AI and things, but the core idea remains: We keep track of who owns what, when they bought it, etc.
技术栈亮点
做大交易规模
Bigger deals
Discretion的收入来自交易成功后的比例抽成,所以收入波动比较大,我们通过服务更多、规模更大的客户来增长收入。一开始我们聚焦ARR 100万到1000万美元的企业,现在服务的标的覆盖ARR 200万到2000万美元,今年我们还会进一步上调服务标的的ARR上限。客户增长完全靠口碑,一旦你能帮创始人把初始报价提升300%,口碑自然就传开了。过去几年我们的年交易规模都远超1亿美元。
Discretion charges a success fee — a percent of the transaction price. That makes revenue highly variable. And we grow our revenue by serving more and larger clients. We started out focusing on companies with $1-10M ARR. Now, we say we do $2-20M ARR, but we'll probably have to bump up that top number a bit this year. Client growth has been via word of mouth. Once you add 300% to someone's initial offer, word gets out. The last few years, we've done well above $100M in transaction volume yearly.
增长策略
市场教育
Educating the market
我们面临的最大挑战是教育创始人,尤其是占我们客户95%的技术型创始人,他们一开始对投行非常不信任,甚至有英国客户把我们叫做“投资傻逼”。他们总觉得自己也能做交易流程省下佣金,从操作层面看确实可以,但并购市场极度不透明,卖家通常一辈子只卖一次公司,自己DIY几乎不可能拿到最高的报价。
The biggest challenge is educating founders — particularly technical founders, which make up about 95% of our clients. They're often pretty suspicious of "investment bankers" — or "investment wankers" as one English client memorably referred to us initially. They often feel like, "Hey, this is something I could just do myself and save the fee." Which is true. They can do it themselves and save the fee. But the problem is that with the market being so opaque and sellers (usually) only ever selling a business once, it's extremely hard to get top dollar if you DIY.
社区共识
- 并购市场极度信息不对称,单次交易的卖家完全没有信息优势
- 传统投行服务中小SaaS标的的动力极低,服务质量差
技术差异化优势
A technical advantage
我们完全不是传统投行的做派,技术背景成了我们最大的优势。我们核心优势竞争对手的基层执行人员大多不懂技术,还经常觉得接这类中小规模的交易是大材小用,服务质量很差。
Being very technical and not your usual "investment wanker" has been a huge plus for us. Often, the junior guys tasked with actually doing the work for the kinds of banks we compete with — at least on the upper end of our ARR range — are not very technical and quite often a bit resentful they've been put on such a "small" deal.
产品差异化
不要抵触销售
Don't be anti-sales
我的建议很简单:不要抵触销售,也不要抵触面向企业客户销售。你要多思考,你能核心建议搭建什么产品,让别人愿意每个月付500甚至5000美元来买。
My advice is simple: Don't be anti-sales. And don't be anti-selling-to-enterprises. It's an incredibly valuable thing to ask yourself, "What can I build that someone would pay $500 (or $5000) a month for?"
核心心态
未来规划
What's next?
我接下来的目标是多去飞钓,你可以访问discretioncapital.com了解更多,也可以在推特@einarvollset找到我。
My goal for the future is to flyfish more. You can check out discretioncapital.com, email me at einar@discretioncapital.com, or watch me argue for fun as @einarvollset on the Twitters.
关键里程碑
2015-2016年 · 出售第二家创业公司,开始为PE提供技术尽调服务
业务启动期 · 自研爬虫系统替代高价商用数据库,搭建自有PE资产库
业务扩张期 · 服务ARR 200-2000万美元SaaS企业,年交易规模破1亿美元
用户评论与创作者回复
已过滤 spam、低价值附和与重复内容 · 原始 27 条 · 展示 11 条 · 创作者回复 0 条
The insight about building scrapers instead of relying on expensive platforms like PitchBook really stands out. That’s the true indie hacker advantage — technical founders can create their own data pipelines and competitive moat rather than paying for costly, off-the-shelf tools.
用自研爬虫替代PitchBook这类高价平台的思路太亮眼了,这才是独立开发者的真正优势:技术创始人可以自建数据流水线和竞争护城河,不用为昂贵的商用工具付费。
笔记:点出了技术人用自有技能构建壁垒的核心逻辑,不用被商用工具的成本绑架。
Curious: when working with founders who are skeptical about fees, do you lean more on data/benchmarks or storytelling to demonstrate value?
很好奇面对质疑佣金的创始人,你更倾向用数据基准还是故事传递价值?
笔记:直击市场教育环节的核心痛点,是所有高客单价服务都要解决的共性问题。
This is a fascinating path — technical depth plus real market insight is such an unfair advantage when used well. Also love the honesty around sales: knowing how the game actually works is often what creates the most value for founders.
这路径太有意思了,技术深度叠加真实市场洞察是非常不公平的竞争优势,关于销售的坦诚也很打动人:懂行业规则才能为客户创造最高价值。
笔记:精准提炼了该项目的核心竞争力,跳出纯技术视角看到了业务本质。
What’s interesting here is that the scrapers weren’t the moat — they were the entry ticket. The real defensibility seems to be judgment earned from seeing hundreds of asymmetric, one-time seller situations.
有意思的是爬虫根本不是护城河,它只是入场券,真正的壁垒是见过数百次单次卖家不对称交易沉淀下来的判断能力。
笔记:点破了很多技术创业者的误区:工具只是基础,经验沉淀才是不可替代的壁垒。
"Don't be anti-sales" is probably the most underrated advice for technical founders. As a developer, it's so tempting to think "if I build something great, people will just find it." I've shipped two products recently and learned the hard way that building is maybe 30% of the work. The other 70% is getting it in front of the right people.
“不要抵触销售”绝对是被严重低估的建议,作为开发者很容易陷入“产品做好自然有人来”的误区,我做过两个产品才发现开发只占30%工作量,剩下70%都是把产品推给精准用户。
笔记:说出了绝大多数技术创始人踩过的坑,非常有普适参考价值。
We recently went through an exit ourselves and the market opacity is REAL. The gap between what you think your business is worth and what buyers actually pay is often 2-3x.
我们自己刚完成一次退出,市场信息不透明是真的,你自己估的价和买家实际愿意出的价通常差2-3倍。
笔记:用亲身经历验证了创始人提到的市场痛点,可信度极高。
This works because selling a company is a one-time, high-stakes, opaque decision. The buyer has reps. The seller doesn’t. Technical credibility + market visibility collapses that asymmetry.
这个模式成立的核心是卖公司是单次、高风险、极度不透明的决策,买家有专业团队,卖家没有,技术可信度+市场信息差直接抹平这种不对称。
笔记:从底层逻辑拆解了业务成立的根本原因,非常有启发性。
Using custom scrapers to replace a team of MBAs and a $50k PitchBook subscription is the most 'Indie Hacker' thing I’ve heard in the M&A space.
用自研爬虫替代一整个MBA团队和5万美元/年的PitchBook订阅,是我在并购领域见过最有独立开发者精神的操作。
笔记:精准点出了该项目最具反差感的亮点,打破了传统投行的刻板印象。
When you first realized founders were getting systematically bad inbound offers, what made you confident this was a repeatable market problem and not just a few isolated cases?
你最早发现创始人收到的邀约普遍被压价的时候,是什么让你确信这是可复制的市场问题,而不是个别案例?
笔记:关注业务从0到1的验证过程,对想切入垂直服务赛道的创业者参考性很强。
"What can I build that someone would pay $500 (or $5000) a month for?" Do you have any suggestions on this, maybe based on your own personal needs or what your clients say?
“我能做什么产品让别人愿意每个月付500甚至5000美元?”能不能基于你自己的需求或者客户的需求给点相关建议?
笔记:抓住了创始人提出的最有普适性的建议,延伸出的问题对所有B2B创业者都有参考意义。
I’m curious how you think about bottlenecks today deal flow, your own bandwidth, and/or maintaining quality as the volume grows?
很好奇当交易规模越来越大的时候,你现在面临的瓶颈是交易线索、个人带宽还是服务质量管控?
笔记:关注业务规模化阶段的核心矛盾,对已经跑通MVP的创业者很有参考价值。
Localization Notes
- 国内SaaS并购市场尚在早期,整体成熟度远低于北美,直接复刻投行业务空间有限
- 金融类服务在国内受强监管,必须先获取对应资质才能合规开展相关业务
- 自研爬虫搭建企业资产数据库的思路可复用,面向国内垂直赛道做轻量级撮合服务门槛更低
- 技术背景切入垂直赛道做企业交易撮合,优先从非金融类的轻资产服务切入更容易落地
- 国内技术创始人同样存在并购信息差,市场教育的核心是用真实成功案例打消不信任感